.关于美国总统肯尼迪的!`what would JFK have done vietnam if his presidency has continued for a second term?如果肯尼迪能继续他的第二个总统任期.他会去解决什么关于越南的!希望大家能用英文回答给我,明天

.关于美国总统肯尼迪的!`what would JFK have done vietnam if his presidency has continued for a second term?如果肯尼迪能继续他的第二个总统任期.他会去解决什么关于越南的!希望大家能用英文回答给我,明天
.关于美国总统肯尼迪的!`
what would JFK have done vietnam if his presidency has continued for a second term?
如果肯尼迪能继续他的第二个总统任期.他会去解决什么关于越南的!
希望大家能用英文回答给我,明天赶课用,希望能尽量长点!
但是我感觉还不够完整阿 ..写好的话 我给你追加分数.

.关于美国总统肯尼迪的!`what would JFK have done vietnam if his presidency has continued for a second term?如果肯尼迪能继续他的第二个总统任期.他会去解决什么关于越南的!希望大家能用英文回答给我,明天
您是要写英文的论文吧,哈哈,这个题目貌似我也写过,本人精通冷战,完全手打---我就不管语法问题了
先给您发个刚写好的开头,后面的漫漫发----您最好提高一下悬赏
What would JFK have done vietnam if his presidency has continued for a second term?
As we all know that Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas on November 22, 1963 in his first term as the president of the United States. In his term, he faced great challenges in domestic policy and foreign policy including the Bay of Pigs Incident in 1961, the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 and the chaos in Vietnam which later became the major trouble of the USA.
Since Kennedy was left right before the time when the next president, Lyndon Johnson, who made the decision to expand the conflict in Vietnam into a larger stage. Therefore, many historians tried to argue that if Kennedy has his second term, he would save the nation from the disaster trap of the Vietnam War. In my essay, I would like to investigate what would JFK have done in Vietnam if his presidency has continued for a second term. To simplify this argument, I will set up my investigation into three steps----First, the introduction of the origin of the Vietnam conflict. Second, the strategy and foreign policy that Kennedy introduced. Third, analyze the Kennedy’s National Security Action Memorandum (NSAM 263). In the end, I will summarize all the above discussion and give out a conclusion.
第二部分也打好了---您也可以顺便去看看我的其它回答,自己在冷战方面的确很在乎（本周正在冲刺军事板块的前5名,需要分啊,哈哈.）
The origin of the Vietnam conflict
The problem of the Vietnam could date back to the period of WW2. Vietnam was French colony after the end of 19th century; however, it was conquered by Japanese troops in the beginning of WW2. When Japan lost the war in 1945, its troops in the north of Vietnam surrendered to the Chinese National Army, and the troops in the south surrendered to the Americans as the decision made in Alliance meetings. This division of surrendering caused the Vietnam to be divided into two spheres of influence---one under China, the other under French. In the north of Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh set up Viet Minh in 1941. After the war, Ho Chi Minh controlled the whole Vietnam and claimed independence from French which caused the so-called First Indo-China War. After the heavy lost of the battle of Dien Bien Phu in 1954, France decided to withdraw from Vietnam through the Geneva Conference. In the conference, major powers decided to divide Vietnam into two parts through the 17th parallel and the election would held to form the united government no later than the July of 1956. However, due to the fear of communism spreading, the American government supported Diem to refuse to hold any election as they know that Ho Chi Minh was more popular. As a result, Vietnam was split into two governments and started a civiler war where the USA had largely involved.
您最好先去投20个票吧---涨涨积分
您现在总共也不到30的积分阿
投完票后就有差不多50了
您这个题目,至少得给50
我在打后两短---至少总共1000字的论文阿,请赶紧吧分数增加到50,谢谢
我已经完全在电脑上打好了----就等着您涨分了---说实话,您就是悬赏100恐怕也没有几个人愿意费力气答的
第三部分的开头
Kennedy’s strategy in Vietnam
As I stated above, the direct interference by the USA was started in Eisenhower’s term. Eisenhower followed the idea of NSC-68 made in 1950 to make the conflict Vietnamize. USA only provided military advisers around 900 men but never put US forces into the battlefield directly. And this situation was actually changed largely in the term of the coming president—JF Kennedy in 1961.
When Kennedy became the president, he mostly maintained the policy of Eisenhower. The new president wanted to use political or economical ways to contain the North Vietnam and stop the spreading of Communism. However, the stability of the South Vietnam government was questionable after the vice-president Johnson had reported his visiting in May of 1961. Kennedy stated that the USA should expand its duty in Vietnam which regarding as larger interference. In June of 1961, Kennedy was facing pressure of the aggressive Khrushchev on the Vienna Conference. The failure of the Bay of Pig and the construction of the Berlin Wall made Kennedy believe that ‘we have a problem making our power credible and Vietnam looks like the place’. Then, Kennedy sent Maxwell Taylor to Vietnam for further investigation and Taylor recommended that the US should set up a more active intervene in Vietnam. This recommendation was facing heavy criticize in the Congress. However, Kennedy still increased the level of intervene due to the larger threat from the North Vietnam. Special force of USA was sent to Vietnam as battle force not adviser as before. By 1963, there were 16,000 American military personnel in South Vietnam, up from Eisenhower's 900 advisors. From the above, I reach that Kennedy had changed Eisenhower’s policy largely and his decision made US forces enter the battlefield for short-solution which later caused the disaster in his first term.
NSAM263
Many believe that with JF Kennedy as president in second term, the USA could get out Vietnam and avoid the disaster. This argument was mostly based on two sources---one was Kennedy’s World Peace Speech in American University on June 10th, 1963 and the other one was the so-called Kennedy's National Security Action Memorandum-263.
Kennedy’s World Peace Speech main idea was an announcement of co-existence with
USSR---‘we all live in a same planet…’ and this was regarding as the action that Kennedy might want to end the cold war. However, the attitude of USSR toward the stop of arm-race was unknown. Though, Khrushchev seemed personal agree with co-existence. His attitude and Kennedy attitude could not end the arm-race and the ideology conflict in short run. The process of the arm-limit talks in late-60s to 70s went very slowly and less efficient. Kennedy who was a politician must aware that his speech could not deal with the problem or end the cold war, he more tend to use this action to form American positive view to the outside world that the USA was calling for ‘peace’ not like that aggressive USSR. So we could not use the speech to predict that Kennedy could let USA out of Vietnam after 1963.
The NSAM263 was signed by JF Kennedy on October 11, 1963 which ordered the withdrawal of 1000 military personnel by the end of 1963. Some argue that this order show that Kennedy decides to withdraw from Vietnam and all USA forces would leave Indo-China in his second term. However, if we compare with Kennedy’s previous policies on Vietnam, a total withdraw would be a total negation of his old foreign policy and American credit would be damaged. After the Bay of Pig Incident, the Second Berlin Crisis, the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy could not give up Vietnam before he could use diplomatic way to either stop the cold war or make negotiation to make sure the Indo-China could be in neutral---just as the Geneva Conference in 1954 which stated that Vietnam would be neutral after election. And it was USA supported the south to reject that offer in Geneva. It would be rather hard for USSR or Ho Chi Minh to accept a similar agreement with US since US broke up the old one. And the attitude of China in American action in Vietnam was unknown. Without Chinese guaranteeing not expand its influence in Eastern-South Asia, any withdrawal was danger for the stability of that area. Therefore, NSAM263 could not regard as an action that Kennedy decides to let USA out Vietnam. Even if he intends to do so, the political environment and the complicated international situation in Indo-China would make him impossible to turn the withdrawal plan into practice. Therefore, I reach that the NSAM263 was limited to prove Kennedy could make total withdrawal of USA forces from Vietnam in his second term.
Conclusion
From the above, I look backward to the origin of the Vietnam War and find out that the USA violated the Geneva Conference was the major cause of the so-called Second Indo-China War. This American policy could date back to NSC-68 in 1950 and Eisenhower made it into practice. In Kennedy Period, JF Kennedy did not intend to stop this policy but even lift it to a higher level of American intervenes except his NSAM263. It was in Kennedy Period, the USA had shifted Vietnam from a less-important phase to a place that would determine the nation’s credit. In this background, Kennedy increased the number of USA’s military personal to save Diem’s South Vietnam from the pressure of both the North and the corruption government itself (South Vietnam) ---since ‘Diem's the only boy we got out there’ (said by Lyndon Johnson after his visiting to Vietnam ordered by Kennedy in 1961).
The aggressive foreign policy of USSR and the fear of either communism or nationalism power of Vietnam to spread to other Asian countries made it hard for Kennedy to achieve a successful withdrawal. The cold war could not stop by either a speech or some thousand men leave from the jungle. Kennedy was not a perfect politician and not a pragmatist indicates that it would be hard for him to end the cold war or make treaty with the Chinese. The situation of 1963 was unclear and less-stable, only when a pragmatist like Nixon became the president who could overthrow the ideology barrier or so-called American credit, the negotiation between the East and West would start and provide a chance for USA’s military personal to leave that place safely and ‘honorably’.
From all those discussion, it reaches the probability that Kennedy could let USA out of Vietnam in his second term would be low. The ‘tragedy’ of the late-60s was hard to avoid.
In the end, my writing remind me of the inaugural speech of JF Kennedy---‘we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and success of liberty’.
Any,any,any…
It would be hard to imagine a man who wishes to pay high price for ‘liberty’ to chose withdraw from Vietnam---which would definitely prove that USA could not achieve its any cost for any goal.
The Heir of Viking
In the midnight of June 13th, 2011
已经完全法上来了----您给分吧
基本上很全面的一篇文章,一共1800字左右
希望您满意---分分分!